![]() ![]() Choose your data collection methods: Decide on the methods, such as surveys, interviews, observations, or experiments, and select the appropriate instruments or tools for collecting data.Identify your population and sampling method: Determine the target population and sample size, and choose the sampling method, such as random, stratified random sampling, or convenience sampling.Choose a type of Research Design: Select the appropriate research design, such as experimental, correlational, survey, case study, or ethnographic, based on the research questions and objectives.Consider your aims and approaches: Determine the research questions and objectives, and identify the theoretical framework and methodology for the study.The process is essential to ensure that the study is valid, reliable, and produces meaningful results. The research design process is a systematic and structured approach to conducting research. The design phase of a study determines which tools to use and how they are used. The research problem an organization faces will determine the design, not vice-versa. There are three main types of designs for research: The design allows researchers to sharpen the research methods suitable for the subject matter and set up their studies for success.Ĭreating a research topic explains the type of research (experimental, survey research, correlational, semi-experimental, review) and its sub-type (experimental design, research problem, descriptive case-study). Research design is the framework of research methods and techniques chosen by a researcher to conduct a study. Qualitative Research vs Quantitative Research.Earth, Water, Air, Fire” by Josep Lluis Mateo & Florian Sauter (Eds. This text, an extract from the book “The Fourth Elements and Architecture. This is a book produced in the warmth of the teaching experience, which uses this ephemeral (and, for the student, initial) encounter with the project as a material which, divested of the anecdotal, can be elevated to category. In the Romantic tradition (on which all of this argumentation is based), the ruin and, in general, the expressive value of the unfinished, of what has been undone yet is still to be done, also emerges as a possibility… At the other extreme, the fragile tent of the nomad (remember Buckminster Fuller and the dabblings of the 1960s). Having ruled out modernization as the uncontrolled application of the tired old prototypes of the metropolis, the intelligent, sensible manipulation of the elements provides the basis for specific projects that are, at once, rooted and globally comprehensible.Īt an initial stage of project development, the relation with the elements as the origin of the project refers us to archetypes: pure protection, the bunker (echoes of Paul Virilio) or the cave. ![]() In the present-day state of globalization, in which the identity-modernity equation is appearing in a new light, the elements reproduced in all cultures as an initial moment with which human construction activity is related form part of a general vocabulary of common arguments. Our activity, at a primitive, archaic but present level consists in modelling the earth to geometrize its surface or piercing it to build foundations, erecting walls and roofs that protect us from rain and snow, and using the energy of fire as light and heat that make the resulting space habitable. The elements save our activity from the pure mathematic abstraction on which technology is based. ![]() The elements relate us to nature as a physical phenomenon that can be experienced with the senses and is therefore directly connected with architecture, which, as we know, addresses the real construction of the world, the alchemic operation that turns concepts into material. In this context, a vindication of the presence of the four elements (earth, water, air, fire) by means of which the pre-Socratic philosophers envisaged humankind’s relation with nature seems extremely useful to the discipline today. It is a frequently abstract, formless argument with religious overtones (appealing more to faith than to reason), utilizable in political verbalism and which drifts easily towards engineering technocracy. Sustainability as an economic but also a moral and political argument is clearly a consensus in our societies. Whereas in our recent past the paradigm by which architecture was measured was the city, now, the collective reference surrounding our design activity is the relation with nature. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |